I just read Chris Lockhart’s interesting post “The Right Stuff“.  In the post Chris wrote about his bias for selecting enterprise architects based on his career experience.  The main topics in the post are:

  • natural selection of IT architects
  • the big picture guy
  • the value of a liberal arts education
  • experiencing the business

Chris wrote about his strong belief that his liberal arts education was a significant influence on being an enterprise architect.  Here are some great quotes:

On the natural selection of IT architects:

I find it bewildering how, in a field that relies on human interaction, we don’t place more emphasis on people skills.

Architects who cannot effectively interact with other human beings are destined to be out-performed by other, more adaptable species.

There is always a challenge when we take deep technical people who are not communicators and put them into senior roles like an enterprise architect.  I wrote a post on “Enterprise Architects – What attributes do you look for?“  I wrote that ” Talent is significantly more important than Skills.  Skills can be taught, talent is something a person brings with them.  Communication skills are particularly difficult to find and cultivate in combination with IT experience.  In our IT department of 100 people, we struggle to find people who can be Strategic Practitioners.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not against smart people. I’m against smart people who take refuge in detail. They don’t make good architects in my experience.

Beware the Enterprise Architect who is better at writing code than your developers.

Chris is bang on here.  Being able to abstract (conceptualize) is a critical talent. When we look for a Strategic Practitioner, here are the talents that we hope to find:

  • conceptualization – explaining complex ideas
  • enterprise perspective – big picture thinking
  • innovation – willing to try and fail
  • facilitation – consensus building
  • leadership – creating a vision and guiding people
  • communication – listening as well as presenting

In Feb 2008, I wrote another post “Being a Teacher works for me …“.  This post has similar themes to Chris’s post and my Strategic Practitioner post.  Using Myers-Briggs indicators can help identify architects in your organization.

Thanks for the post Chris. I will be checking in on your blog regularly.

 

New Initiatives in Shared Network Applications – Identity Management Working Group Report 2010

To watch our panel presentation, click here for the video

IDM Working Group Purpose

As a working group under the direction of the Applications Advisory Committee (APAC), the group will seek to create a forum for inter-institutional discussion of identity management issues while encouraging the collaboration and exchange of ideas and information between BCNET member institutions, other provincial post-secondary educational institutions and provincial and federal public sectors, including government and health care authorities.

Membership

Membership consists of IDM specialists from each BCNet member institution as well as BC Campus.

Projects

Eduroam – led the Canadian introduction of Eduroam with BCNet members.  Developed policies, procedures and support for Eduroam in BC.  Led the creation of the Canadian Access Federation, who now is responsible for Eduroam as well as Shibboleth. Canada joined the Eduroam federation in April 2008.

What is eduroam?

Do you need wireless access from your laptop around the world?

eduroam (education roaming) lets you do this.

Let’s say you are planning to attend an upcoming conference at the University of Calgary, or perhaps you are visiting the University of Western Ontario from the University of Amsterdam.

If you need wireless access, you will no longer need a guest account from the campus you are visiting — you simply use eduroam. Set it up once at your home institution, and it will work at any other eduroam member institution in the world!

Canadian Eduroam Membership – 23 members and counting …

  • BC – 7 members
  • Alberta – 3
  • Saskatchewan – 1
  • Ontario – 8
  • Quebec – 2
  • New Brunswick – 1
  • Newfoundland – 1

BCNet IDM Working Group continues to advocate to other higher education institutions around the province to join Eduroam.

BCNet IDM Workshop – May 2010

On Monday, May 3rd the BCNet IDM Working Group hosted a full day workshop for BCNet members, BC Campus and guests from the BC Government Office of the CIO, Health Authorities and Oracle. Four years ago, the IDM WG hosted a full day at SFU Burnaby.  For those of us who were there, today would prove to be interesting to see how far IDM initiatives had come.

The day started with Peter Watkins from the BC Government Office of the Chief Information Officer talking about the Provincial work on Claims Based IDM Architecture and the future possibilities and challenges.

Randy Bruce from BC Campus was up next talking about their IDM initiatives especially the links with PASBC.  SFU led the membership presentations talking about LDAP, CAS, Shibboleth and Open Registry.

 

Corey Scholefield, Paul Hilchey – University of Victoria

IDAM Framework Objectives

  • implemented SGHE platform
  • centralized the management of identity information
  • role based access
  • evolve away from batch processes
  • enhanced security
  • personalize, customize and enhance end user experiences
  • enhance partnerships with Information Security Office and University Privacy Officer(s)

Current Projects

  • Sun Identity Manager Upgrade to 8.1 – allows for business roles, IT roles, application roles, asset roles …
  • CAS SSO
  • Banner ERP Refresh
  • uPortal rollout (migration away from Luminis Portal?)
  • Affiliate IDM system

Showed a diagram of UVic Sun Identity Manager Deployment Overview and Enterprise IDAM Overview

I liked the organization of the Enterprise IDAM diagram into layers:

  • Identity Authority Source Tier – Banner ERP is the driving system of record
  • Identity and Access Management Service Tier
  • Managed Resource Tier – LDAP and AD client applications
  • Client Application Tier

* great project – “Useless Person Culling” – anyone in the directory with an ID, name and nothing else was culled. Helped clean up about 100K IDs

Demo – Scenario

  • user has recently become FT employee
  • pre-provisions complete , no username yet
  • person goes to self-service to set up Netlink ID
  • Sun IDM provisions access to resources
© 2007-2012 Enterprise Architecture in Higher Education - Leo de Sousa Creative Commons License
Enterprise Architecture in Higher Education by Leo de Sousa is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Based on a work at leodesousa.ca.
Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Switch to our mobile site