Gene Leganza (@gleganza) VP and Principal Analyst, Forrester Research Inc discusses and presents on Technology Trends.  Gene used the following criteria (Impact, Newness, Complexity) to help describe the trends. In Oct 2010, Gene wrote about the Top 15 Technology Trends on his Forrester blog.  Gene published a table of the top trends here.

On Jan 26, 2011, Gene presented a webinar about his research.  Here are some notes I took:

Theme 1 Empowered Technologies

SaaS and cloud based platforms become standard

  • Customer community platforms integerate with business applications
  • Apps and business processes go mobile
  • Collaboration moves from document centric to people centric

Theme 2 Process Centric Data and Intelligence

  • Next gen BI takes shape
  • IaaS finds a broader audience
  • Master data management matures
  • Analytics target text and social networks

Theme 3 Agile and Fit-to-Purpose Applications

  • Business rules processing move to mainstream
  • BPM will be Web 2.0 enabled
  • Event driven patterns demand attention

Theme 4 Smart Technology Management

  • Systems management enables continued virtualization
  • Client virtualization is ubiquitous
  • IT embraces planning and analytics tools

Recommendations

  • Craft your internal innovation process
  • Integrate your criteria with your business model and priorities
  • Use an annual scan as input to next year’s research agenda
  • Socialize and communicate – create your “technology watch annual report”

Thanks for the insights Gene. I will be looking at our enterprise architecture and see how your themes fit.

One area I would like to comment on in Theme 1 Empowered Technologies.  There is still not enough research and policy work being done on privacy and security for cloud based services.  Influencing governments particularly those outside the United States to modernize their thinking and laws will be a much longer road.  In the meantime, those of us outside the US continue to struggle with the adoption of cloud based services due to things like the Patriot Act and our own privacy laws.

     

    I have been thinking a lot about re-engineering the service delivery model for the application services team that I lead. I have been guiding my team to think about:

    “We deliver the platform and work with the business to provide services”.

    Our applications team is made up of subgroups aligned by major application services.  Here are the major applications:

    • Business Intelligence
    • Collaboration Tools
    • Document Management
    • Email and Calendaring
    • ERP (Student, Finance, HR, Doc Mgmt)
    • Identity Management
    • Learning Management Applications
    • Microsoft Applications
    • Oracle Database
    • Portal (for students and employees)
    • SQL Server Database

    Currently, there are 3 teams in place in our Business Application Services group. Here are the roles in each team:

    Support Team

    • Oracle DBA
    • Document Management
    • Business Intelligence
    • Project Management
    • Business Analysis
    • Identity Management

    Email and Collaboration Team

    • Email
    • Calendaring
    • Instant Messaging
    • Collaboration Platforms
    • SQL Server DBA
    • Microsoft Applications
    • Enterprise Portal

    Developer Team

    • Oracle Developers
    • Lotus Domino Developers
    • Microsoft Developers
    • Java/Web Services Developers

    I am interested in hearing from any of you that lead groups with similar responsibilities.  Do you have a suggested structure for me to consider?  Do you split your team based on roles (technology domains)  or by application (vendor) platforms? Do you split operational work from project delivery?  Does your governance structure influence your teams organization?

    Any suggestions are very welcome and I hope to learn from some of your experiences.  Thanks in advance.

     

    Andy Blumenthal wrote a great post “Adaptive Leaders Rule the Day“. In his post, Andy reviewed a Harvard Business Review July 2009 article “Leadership in a (Permanent) Crisis” and commented on the article’s insights on adaptive leadership.

    I really liked Andy’s quote Leaders need a proverbial “toolkit” of successful behaviors to succeed and even more so be able to adapt and create innovative new tools to meet new unchartered situations.”

    Andy listed some of the successful behaviours in the “toolkit”.  I recommend you read the full article to get all of Andy’s insights. 

    Here is the list of successful behaviours:

    • “Foster adaptation”
    • Stabilize, then solve
    • Experiment
    • “Embrace disequilibrium”
    • Make people safe to question
    • Leverage diversity

    Taking a similar approach to my previous post on Generative EA Principles, I will explore and share how Andy’s list of behaviours fit with our EA practice (and maybe yours).  We have a long way to go to fully leverage the successful behaviours but having some clear names for what we have accomplished helps.  Thanks Andy!

    Foster adaptation: leaders must develop ‘next practices’ while excelling at today’s best practices.” In 2005, we established the Strategic Practices groupin our IT Services department. This group role is responsible for the development, maturation and integration of a broad set of IT disciplines and methodologies across all areas of IT Services. These disciplines are intended to raise the level of rigor and reliability of all of our technical implementations while ensuring that IT investments are aligned with institutional strategy. The Strategic Practices group includes practices like enterprise architecture, business analysis, project management, business continuity, IT security, risk management and performance management. Think of these as our ‘next practices’.  At the same time, we adopted the IT Infrastructure Library (ITIL) framework for standardizing, managing and measuring our core service delivery. So far we have implemented the Service Desk function, Incident Management, Change Management, Problem Management, Asset Management and are building out Configuration, Capacity and Availability Management processes. These are today’s best practices.

    © 2007-2012 Enterprise Architecture in Higher Education - Leo de Sousa Creative Commons License
    Enterprise Architecture in Higher Education by Leo de Sousa is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
    Based on a work at leodesousa.ca.
    Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

    Switch to our mobile site