<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Enterprise Architecture in Higher Education &#187; zachman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leodesousa.ca/tag/zachman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leodesousa.ca</link>
	<description>a practical approach by Leo de Sousa</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 21:45:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is it really &#8220;Zachman&#8217;s Fatal Flaw&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://leodesousa.ca/2010/07/is-it-really-zachmans-fatal-flaw/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=is-it-really-zachmans-fatal-flaw</link>
		<comments>http://leodesousa.ca/2010/07/is-it-really-zachmans-fatal-flaw/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 17:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Leo de Sousa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[enterprise architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategic planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capability maturity model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zachman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leodesousa.ca/?p=952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My friend Nick Malik wrote a post - Zachman&#8217;s Fatal Flaw: No Row for Customer.  Here is my response &#8230; Do I believe that Zachman&#8217;s Framework is fatally flawed?  No. It all depends on your perspective and that to me is defined by your EA maturity.  How we view and evaluate models and frameworks depends <a href='http://leodesousa.ca/2010/07/is-it-really-zachmans-fatal-flaw/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://leodesousa.ca/2010/07/is-it-really-zachmans-fatal-flaw/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thinking about frameworks and geometry</title>
		<link>http://leodesousa.ca/2009/01/think-about-frameworks-and-geometry/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=think-about-frameworks-and-geometry</link>
		<comments>http://leodesousa.ca/2009/01/think-about-frameworks-and-geometry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 02:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Leo de Sousa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[enterprise architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zachman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leodesousa.ca/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike Kavis&#8216; got me thinking about EA frameworks with his Twitter posts about the E2AF. The Zachman Framework was my first introduction to an EA framework in 2004 and it continues to be a significant reference model for how I think about EA. Here is a slide of the Zachman Framework Version 2.  The geometry of Zachman sits in one and <a href='http://leodesousa.ca/2009/01/think-about-frameworks-and-geometry/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://leodesousa.ca/2009/01/think-about-frameworks-and-geometry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time flies when you are having fun &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://leodesousa.ca/2008/04/time-flies-when-you-are-having-fun/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=time-flies-when-you-are-having-fun</link>
		<comments>http://leodesousa.ca/2008/04/time-flies-when-you-are-having-fun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 23:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Leo de Sousa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[enterprise architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zachman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leodesousa.ca/?p=45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Friday, I hit an anniversary of sorts &#8230; it has been 3 years since my organization formally established the Enterprise Architect position, that I have been in.  In Sept 2007, I moved from a senior staff member to management and was able to elevate EA leadership to the management level. Even though I feel <a href='http://leodesousa.ca/2008/04/time-flies-when-you-are-having-fun/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://leodesousa.ca/2008/04/time-flies-when-you-are-having-fun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EA Model V.2</title>
		<link>http://leodesousa.ca/2007/06/ea-model-v2/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ea-model-v2</link>
		<comments>http://leodesousa.ca/2007/06/ea-model-v2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 06:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Leo de Sousa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[enterprise architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[it governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itsm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zachman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leodesousa.ca/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two years ago, Dave Cresswell and I came up with a graphic to represent Enterprise Architecture @ BCIT. We needed a simple graphic to communicate EA and also knew that showing our senior Executive the Zachman Framework was too complex. Here is first draft EA model: and Version 1 : At that point, I was <a href='http://leodesousa.ca/2007/06/ea-model-v2/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://leodesousa.ca/2007/06/ea-model-v2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

